(from Peppermints in the Parlor)
In front of Emily stood a gleaming bowl
Of pink-and-white striped peppermints.
Her eyes were glued to the colorful and yummy candy
as her mouth was watering with temptation.
She dared not to touch them,
not a single move that would reveal
the cries of her desire.
For she knew that there,
awaiting for her failure to resist
was the whip —
unhesitant, swift, fierce.
Aunt Twice wouldn’t let her either,
afraid ofthe consequence of sinning.
They were the rightful owners
but made servants,
so Emily bowed her head,
bidding farewell to her peppermints
and the luxury that should have been hers.
Psychoanalytic
I tried to incorporate Freud’s Psychoanalytic theory through Emily’s struggle with the temptation of her favorite peppermints. The Id, the pleasure-seeking part, is Emily’s desire of touching or eating the peppermints. The Ego is the rational part that tells Emily of the consequences that lie ahead if she won’t restrain herself. If she eats the peppermint, she will have a taste of its deliciousness again; but if she does touch it, she will also taste the harsh whip. Meanwhile, the Superego, the one which holds the moral/ideal principle, is depicted by Emily’s awareness that she has been demoted as a servant; therefore, she must control her temptation.
Posted in The Extension | Tagged christian jane, emily, emily's peppermints, peppermints | No Comments »


